The Media Doesn't Get Math


 Pet peeve time.

On Thursday an analysis was released by the Mayo Clinic Proceedings based on data collected by the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study regarding health effects of drinking coffee.  To the credit of the data collectors, this study looked at 40,000 people over 16 years including ages ranging from 20 to 87 years old.  Now you may have seen this in your newspapers, morning talk shows, and evening news with the headline “Drinking more than 4 cups of coffee increases mortality rate by 21%.” 

Now I am fairly skeptical of these types of headlines, and chain emails too for that matter, which is why Factcheck.org and Snopes.com are web page favorites.  The problem I have with the media drawing conclusions about data and research is obvious: they need to sensationalize the story, and nothing sensationalizes like fear (greed too).  Also, I am not a statistician, but I know enough about statistical analysis to never take a news reader’s (yes that’s what they are) word on anything.  I also, challenge polling and surveys as they are often suffer from study bias.  Go ahead and read the questions in certain surveys and you will see how they can be constructed to generate the response the surveyor is HOPING to get. 

But what about this study specifically gets my math geek nerd blood boiling?  No causation.  You see to make a direct link between coffee consumption and mortality rate, there needs to be statistically significant data to support that causation: drinking 4 cups of coffee causes higher mortality rate.  What the study may have proven is correlation.  Causation is pretty straightforward “Do ‘X’ and it will lead to ‘Y’”.  Correlation on the other hand states “When ‘X’ goes up ‘Y’ goes up or down.”  The difference is under correlation, there is no connection in tying ‘X” as the cause of ‘Y’.

An example:

Fact: There are more accidental swimming pool drownings in the summer.

Fact: More ice cream is consumed during the summer.

Conclusion: Eating ice cream can increase the odds of drowning.

Clearly that conclusion is erroneous, there is no causation, but there is correlation.  I realize the example is outlandish, but it is to make the point that drawing causality conclusions from data can often be misleading especially in the hands of a newsreader.

Are we drinking too much coffee?  I wouldn’t be surprised if we are as we seem to be consuming too much of EVERYTHING…right Mayor Bloomberg?

Perhaps after all, four out of five dentists don’t recommend Trident Sugarless Gum.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Secular American Jew and a Love for Israel

As many of you know, I have dedicated many postings to the State of Israel on a range of topics including: it’s history, the present day government, the Jewish-Palestinian question, and the region in general.   Growing up in a liberal conservative Jewish household (the oxymoron is quite common as American Jews were almost exclusively political liberals and the conservative branch of Judaism the most common) and attending Hebrew school as a kid you obviously build an affinity for the State of Israel.   I do not remember the Six-Day War of 1967, but I have vivid memories of celebrating Israel’s 25 th anniversary in 1973 and the Yom Kippur War later that year.   As a ten year old attending Yom Kippur services I saw the worried looks on my parents and the other adults at the shul as members of the congregation would periodically step outside to get news reports from car radios and transistor radios (We still drove and used electrical appliances during the high holidays, though several fam
Read more

September 10, 2001 was a Monday

Where were you on September 10, 2001?   What were you worried about?   What occupied your thoughts, worries, hopes, and dreams?   What were you excited about?   What were you interested in? September 10, 2001 was a Monday. Cindy and I were still laughing about the recent visit from the Three Amigas: Leah, Roseanne, and Valerie, and the adventures of Sedona, a certain screen door, a forgotten carrot cake, and breakfast for champions.   We were also dealing with a 1995 Chevy Blazer that seemed to be on its last legs, surviving our first Arizona summer, thinking about what to remodel in the house, dealing with the concept of a Home Owners Association, thinking that my best shot at a World Series game maybe with the fledgling Arizona Diamondbacks, and looking forward to a visit from Scott, Lori, and the boys. But what about America?   We knew nothing about a tiny town in Pennsylvania called Shanksville; Guantanamo Bay was the setting for A Few Good Men, and we still taped shows and listene
Read more

Sunni and Shia: So who are the bad guys again?

Baby faces vs. heals?   Cowboys vs Indians?   Good guy always where the white hat.   “Dig is he a good guy or bad guy?”   Bad guys always, looked, well, bad. You’re either with us or you’re against us.   Iraq, Iran, and North Korea are the axis of evil. Americans, for the most part, have a pretty simple outlook on conflict: just tell us who the bad guys are and we’ll know who to root against.   We tend to lump similar races and peoples into larger buckets, mostly due to the media’s inclination to treat us like potential Jeff Foxworthy competitors.   But the world is anything but simple and as I have written previously, the Middle East is as confusing and confounding place as you can find.   During the Iran and Iraq war of the 1980’s most Americans took the position that “…as long as they kill each other, I’m good.”   When civil war ravaged Afghanistan, we joined the side of the Mujahedeen because they were fighting the Soviets and the Soviets were our archenemy, a position they occupie
Read more