What does success look like in the Near and Middle East?
Form McCain to Limbaugh, the right loves to criticize the
U.S. Near and Middle East policies. You
make sense out of:
Hamas runs Gaza but lost its patron Iran when the
Palestinian organization came out against Bashar al-Assad in the Syrian civil
war. It then lost its brief patron in
Egypt when the short-lived Muslim Brotherhood was overthrown in a coup.
Israel was paying Hamas military leader Ahmed al-Jabari to keep the peace and
when he couldn’t control Islamic Jihad and Al-Qassam, he was summarily executed
via missile attack by an Israeli helicopter.
Iran
is now providing money and weapons to Hamas’ rival Islamic Jihad which
threatens Hamas’ control in Gaza. The new military leaders in Egypt have flooded
and sealed tunnels from the Sinai into Gaza strangling the Palestinian economy
in the enclave.
Kurds
in Syria are fighting with AND against various anti-Assad Islamist factions in
Syria.
Iraq’s
Shia led government wanted the U.S. out of Iraq, and now is asking for U.S.
help to deal with Sunni insurrectionists.
The
moderate Sunni Saudis won’t allow women to vote and export the violent militant
conservative Wahhabism throughout the region.
The
9/11 hijackers hailed from alleged ‘friendly’ Sunni nations: Saudi Arabia,
Egypt, Lebanon, and the UAE.
Somehow
President Obama allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to overthrow Hosni Mubarak and
allowed the Egyptian Military overthrow the Muslim Brotherhood.
Inhabitants
of many Afghanistan’s provinces do not even recognize the nation of
Afghanistan, only their local tribal rulers.
U.S.
has historically chosen short term national interests over long term mutual
interests: Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the ex-Soviet republics.
Saudi
Arabia and Israel are equally worried about US-Iranian engagement proving “The
enemy of my enemy is my friend” is alive and well in the Middle East.
As
the U.S. becomes less dependent on Middle Eastern Oil, our strategic interests
should pivot towards Asia leaving regional issues to local players: Iran, Turkey,
Saudi Arabia, and Israel.
The
Kuwaitis, Qataris, and Saudis prefer to fund their proxies and never get their
hands dirty.
Turkey
continues to slip deeper and deeper down the Islamist path form its secular
past hoping to reinvigorate its Ottoman past and control of the Arab world.
In a region
littered with terrorist organizations, the heads of states of our alleged
friends: Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey are proving to be the most
difficult to work with.
Over
the last three decades Israel has flourished thanks to strategic partnerships
with Sunni autocrats while sewing dissension between rival anti-establishment
factions.
Russia
continues to maintain its relations with Syria and is now pursuing advanced
military ties with Egypt. Back to the
Cold War of the 60’s and 70’s.
Yes
Assad must go, but the aftermath will be much worse.
Christian
rightwing congressmen in the US are in no hurry to back the Syrian rebels, as
the Christian minority there could become victims of sectarian violence.
Saudi
Arabia already seeking nuclear technology from Pakistan.
In
Syria you have Hezbollah fighting Hamas, Sunnis fighting Sunnis, Iraqis
fighting Iraqis, etc.
…and
you wonder why a U.S. Middle Eastern Foreign Policy is complicated?
Comments
Post a Comment