Diggapedia

Most negotiations boil down to getting what you feel is important while sacrificing points that are not as critical.   So if two parties walk away thinking they got what they wanted while letting the other side get something, both parties think they won.   Unfortunately, the devil is in the details and while we live in a digital world, negotiations are analog.   In business to business this can be seen in: “Yes we agree that you should be able to raise prices, but we don’t agree with your formula.” Or in sports it often boils down to incentive clauses, but what performance metrics (points, goals, wins, etc.), what point, and is there a sliding scale.   Often these negotiations are initiated when one side floats a Term Sheet or Memo of Understanding, and if both sides see enough common ground here, formal contract negotiations ensue. In Washington, we see this in the form of floating ideas to gauge the opposition’s response.   The GOP stuck out its chin talkin...

This is by no means an expansive review of the 2012 political year.   Nor is it a top ten list, as every cable news station and talk radio show has created their lists and checked them twice.   Instead, here are my thoughts on what was the political year. Let me start by saying that political tricks and shenanigans are like most movies and television shows: there is very little original material or innovation.   Pick any time in American History   and you will find the same wheeling and dealing, the same attack pieces, the same gamesmanship, the same special interests, and the same political manipulations.   In 2012 we were worried that the Citizens United decision would cause such an influx of special interests’ money that and that government of the people, by the people, for the people would no longer exist.   Irrespective of Citizens United, our government is unduly influenced by special interests and their lobbyists.   Every industry spends ...

1)       Will lactose intolerant people be as indifferent to the milk cliff as nonsmokers are to increased tobacco taxes? 2)       Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and his Likud party are seeing its January 22 nd election popularity waning at the expense of his former aide Naftali Bennett and the rightist Bayit Yehudi (Jewish Home) party.   The 40 year old son of American immigrants, Bennett has called for unconstrained settlement expansion while opposing the creation of a Palestinian state.   Since Netanyahu will not have a majority, he will have to choose between a hard right wing coalition or the mish mash of center left parties to form a government.   The stakes are high and could set the peace process back 20 years.   Sadly, I see Netanyahu choosing his former aide, putting the Israeli government at odds with its patron in Washington.   What is even more disappointing is the clear shift in the Israeli ...

Last week while in New York, we visited the Museum of Jewish Heritage and its Living Memorial to the Holocaust in Battery Park.   One cannot help but be struck by the horror of the Nazis, their collaborators, and those that facilitated and perpetrated the persecution, systematic murder, and decimation of Jews, Romas, and other ‘unwanted people’.   Men, women, children, young, old, doctors, artists, lawyers, craftsmen, etc. It did not matter.   But there is more to the story than the rise of the Nazis, the concentrations camps, and ultimately the death camps.   The holocaust or Shoah, was but the most recent chapter in thousands of years of persecution and anti-Semitism.   Many love to celebrate the holy crusades, yes these same crusades murdered Jews.   The glory of the Columbus voyage in 1492; financed by the Spanish crown while the same crown systematically rounded up Jews and Muslims and offered the choice of conversion to Christianity or death. I h...

Twenty Questions and Comments for a Holiday Weekend; 1)       Is there a worse mall smell than the offensive odor emanating from an Auntie Anne’s Pretzel Shop? 2)       Are mid-season NCAAM basketball rankings as useless as announcing the starting lineups of   a hockey game? 3)       If the NRA sponsored GOP thinks that it is necessary to arm good guys for protection against bad guys, do they support nuclear-armed Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, and Bahrain if Iran achieves nuclear capability? 4)       GOP lead House calls for investigations into Fast and the Furious over the death of one Border Agent, but why are they mute on #SandyHook?   (OK that one’s a rhetorical question). 5)       If mental illness is a pre-existing condition, and Obamacare makes sure pre-existing conditions do not prevent people from getting health insurance, an...

So Mike Huckabee thinks we need more God in the classroom? Did you know that the Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892 by Francis Bellamy, a Socialist Baptist Minister?  The National Education Association requested the pledge be written to demonstrate the unity of our growing diversity in public schools.  A believer in the absolute separation of church and state, it is safe to say that when his ubiquitous pledge was modified in 1954during the Joseph McCarthy led anti-communism, anti-atheism, anti-enlightened histrionics to include the words ‘under God’ he would have been mortified.  It seems that “one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” has a history of being quite controversial because the catholic Church opposed it during World War I because it was making American Catholics, more American than Catholic. You see, it's called public school for a reason and we haven't taken God out of the school as Huckabee cries.  It was never meant to...

On December 16, 1689 an Act of Parliament created the English Bill of Rights.   Amongst these rights were: Protestant subjects "may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions, and allowed by law".   100 years later the US Constitution would also include a Bill of Rights, and its 2 nd amendment would state: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. There is little debate that our Bill of Rights were strongly based on the English Bill of Rights.   But the English Bill of Rights was as much about righting the wrongs of the monarchy and establishing Parliament’s power while the American counterpart was about protecting citizens from tyrannical government.   Nonetheless, when it came to guns, the English Bill of Rights was specifically addressing the 1671Game Act that forbid Protestants from owning guns.     This new Bill of Rights would ...